Omar Harb

advisor

USEK - Holy spirit University of Kaslik

Lebanon

As an architect and founder of Omar Harb Architects & Associates, my work centers on creating… more

The design demonstrates a thoughtful conceptual framework and a clear attempt to integrate programmatic requirements into a cohesive architectural narrative. The proposal exhibits a strong visual language and an awareness of spatial organization, suggesting a deliberate engagement with form and function. The use of diagrams and plans helps communicate the core ideas, and the overall presentation indicates a solid design effort.

The project’s strengths lie in its conceptual clarity and ambition. There is evidence of thoughtful exploration of spatial relationships, and the author shows a willingness to experiment with formal expression. In particular, the arrangement of primary elements suggests an intent to balance functional needs with architectural character.

Despite these positive attributes, the submission would benefit from further refinement in several areas. The connection between the conceptual drivers and technical resolution is not yet fully articulated, which at times creates ambiguity in how the design will perform in real conditions. Some spatial transitions and programmatic adjacencies lack clarity, affecting the legibility of certain key zones. Additionally, deeper engagement with the environmental and contextual constraints of the site would strengthen the proposal’s relevance and responsiveness.

Overall, Project 9638 shows promising conceptual thinking and a strong visual direction. With enhanced technical development and clearer integration of context and performance criteria, the design could achieve a higher level of architectural depth and coherence.

1. Strengthen Concept-to-Detail Linkage
Clarify how the conceptual drivers translate into structural strategies, material systems, and detailing. Ensure that the design idea is consistently reflected down to the level of technical decisions.

2. Refine Spatial Logic and Circulation
Review the spatial hierarchy and circulation paths to ensure functional clarity. Key transitions should be articulated clearly, with supporting plans and sections that illustrate how different zones relate and connect.

3. Deepen Contextual and Environmental Integration
Conduct deeper contextual analysis (site constraints, climate, cultural and urban conditions) and demonstrate how the design responds to these factors. Integrate passive environmental strategies (orientation, sun shading, ventilation) into the architectural logic.

4. Enhance Presentation Quality
Improve clarity and annotation of drawings and diagrams. Include analytical graphics showing program distribution, structural rationale, environmental performance, and circulation flows. This will make design decisions more transparent and defendable.

5. Material and Structural Rationale
Define the material palette and structural logic more clearly. Explain how material choices support performance, durability, and aesthetic intent. A stronger rationale here will reinforce overall design coherence.

Optional add-on
User Experience & Human Scale: Expand on how spaces will feel in use.

Sustainability: Include specific strategies or metrics (e.g., daylight studies, energy performance).

Constructability: Demonstrate how design complexity aligns with realistic construction logic.
27.02.2026